Update May 4th, 2022:
After many customer feedback about our CMOS-Optimized Narrowband filters, we learned that it is necessary to finetune our current f/2 Highspeed filters into two filter categories of Ultra-Highspeed filters for f/2 (working range <f/2.3) and – NEW – f/3 (working range f/2.3 to f/3.4). Further Information about this as well as a detailed whitepaper can be found in our Blogpost Preshift and further Information concerning Baader CMOS-Filters.
Update October 1st: New LRGB-Filters have been added to the line of CMOS-optimized Baader Filters. The post below has been modified to reflect these changes.
"Finding the way" has a long tradition at Baader Planetarium. The slogan got created by our companies founder Claus Baader – in 1966, when "the Baader Planetarium-Orrery" was announced to the world. And within those many years we always tried to find ways for our technical solutions – and the domes – to stand the test of time. The Baader Planetarium Orrery btw. might have the longest product existence in modern industry – we still produce it here in house – unchanged since 1966 (if you like, check a tiny bit of the print material published at that time).
Today we have a similar situation – we worked hard for two years and the "feeling" here is just like way back then. For our new filters:
WE FOUND THE WAY
... to finally and cost-effectively tackle the problem of filters being accused of creating unbearable halos when put into close vincinity of correcting lenses – in conjunction with latest generation CMOS-chips. Hence we introduce our four new families of Baader (Ultra) Narrowband / Highspeed filters:
- 6,5 nm Narrowband Filters, CMOS-optimized – for > f/3.4
- 3,5 / 4 nm Ultra-Narrowband Filters, CMOS-optimized – for > f/3.4
- 6,5 nm f/2 Highspeed Filters, CMOS-optimized – for ≤ f/3.4
- NEW: 3,5 / 4 nm f/3 Ultra-Highspeed Filters, CMOS-optimized – for f/2.3 to f/3.4
- CHANGED: 3,5 / 4 nm f/2 Ultra-Highspeed Filters, CMOS-optimized – for < f/2.3 (previously f/3.4 to f/1.8)
Update October 1st: As well as our new CMOS-optimized LRGB Filters
- RGB-R (595 – 690 nm) Bandpass Filter
- RGB-G (490 – 580 nm) Bandpass Filter
- RGB-B (400 – 510 nm) Bandpass Filter
- UV/IR-Cut / L-Filter (420 – 685 nm)
All these new filters are designated as CMOS-optimized, with the same high quality and engineering you expect from the Baader family of products.
This very problem had almost got us "over the edge". For more than a decade, during the reign of CCD-cameras, our Baader Narrowband-filters had served somewhat as an industry-standard in astro-filter technology. And "all of a sudden", with always newer and revolutionary CMOS-chips hitting the market, people started to complain about halos, whenever a coma-corrector, field-flattener or reducer-corrector would be placed in close vincinity to one of our filters. We studied far and wide and for some time took some soothing from the fact that amateur forums around the world had similar reports for our much higher priced competitors. However, some solution to this just had to be found – but without just have filter prices skyrocketing as was the case everywhere. As a consequence we looked into latest advanced coating technologies and how to use it in ways to address this most severe problem, since nowadays almost any telescope would use such auxillary-optics closely in front of the chip-plane.
Eventually, with significant investment in R&D, we ran from one prototype run into the next for almost all of the years from 2019 until now (middle of 2021). Countless nights were spent under the stars to evaluate so many different coating systems on all new filter families.
However, after much heartship we are absolutely convinced that our new Reflex-Blocker™ coating systems are addressing this severe problem in a very satisfying fashion, with just a moderate increase in price. You will be the judge.
This new generation of Baader CMOS-filters features:
- Increased contrast, matched for typical CMOS quantum efficiency and s/n ratio
- Reflex-Blocker™ coatings, for largest ever freedom from halos, even under most adverse conditions concerning aux-optics
- (Ultra) Narrowband/Highspeed: Ever more narrow passbands
- (Ultra) Narrowband/Highspeed: FWHM on each filter category carefully designed to allow for 1:1:1 exposures
- Identical filter thickness to existing standards, with utmost care for parfocality
- Blackened edges all around, with filter-lead-side-indicator in the form of a telescope-sided black outer rim, to additionally eliminate any reflection due to light falling onto the edge of a filter
- Each filter coated individually, with sealed coating edge (NOT cut out of a larger plate with coatings left exposed, read more)
- Life-Coat™: evermore hard coatings to enable a non-aging coating for life – even in a most adverse environment
We are most confident, anyone using latest CMOS-technology will see the improvement right away – for his/her lifetime! This new CMOS-optimized filter generation is meant to stay and become the new standard in the amateur-word of imagers.
In the future...
Similarly designed Photometric Filters (featuring identical standard thickness alike all our filters as well as all standard sizes) are under preparation for the science world in the form of SLOAN/SDSS and modern BVR (Bessel-conform) filters – likewise using our Reflex-Blocker coating technology, to be fully suitable for 24/7 operation.
Images results and test reviews
UPDATE: Testers of regular production series filters
The Celestron RASA 8 and the Baader High-Speed Ultra-Narrowband filters are a perfect match.
I’ve noticed a couple of things off the bat about these new filters:
1. The narrow bandpasses contributed to stronger and cleaner signal and helped maximize the time under heavily light polluted skies. In only ~4 hours, I was able to pick up the upper tail / H-alpha filaments on the Eastern Veil Nebula that I simply wasn’t able to pick up on any other attempt of this target.
2. That there were no profound halos. 52Cyg is a decently bright star near NGC 6960 and the new Baader H-alpha and [O III] filter handled it well. I didn't see any reflections of my cable router in the images or anything that would warrant further inspection. I should disclose that my sole test of the [O III] filter was on NGC 6960, as I was only slewing to H-alpha objects in Cygnus to avoid switching filters on the RASA. As I began one night on [O III], my luck in clear nights ran out. I intend to test this filter further, but the initial results are incredible.
During the week of imaging, however, I was able to gather over 20 hours total of these 6 Ha images: Butterfly Nebula (IC 1318), Western Veil (NGC 6960), Eastern Veil (NGC 6992), North America Nebula Crop of Cygnus Wall (NGC 7000), The Tulip Nebula (Sh2-101), and The Crescent Nebula (NGC 6888). The shortest of the fully integrated images being the North America Nebula, which was only 1 hour and 18 minutes. The longest of the bunch being the Eastern Veil, which was 5 hours and 8 Minutes.
Final Thoughts: Coming from the original Baader F/2 images, I expected the filters to perform well. To produce these quality and quantity of images in only ~20 hours, again, shows the power of these newer filters. I fully endorse them for anyone with fast optics, especially if they are seeking to maximize their time under light polluted skies. Ultimately, the performance met my expectations and I can’t wait to put together more full color images!
Chris Hendren (Technical Support Manager at Celestron Torrance/CA)
Recently, I lucked out and had clear skies until at least 2 AM for 3 nights in a row from my Bortle 9 back yard sky in overwhelmingly-bright Long Beach, California. That let me test out the new Baader 6.5nm CMOS-optimized high-speed filters with the RASA 8 under very tough conditions. Except for the bright magnitude 2.2 star Sadr (Gamma Cygni) in OIII and a much lesser extent in SII, there were no haloes to be seen on any stars with 5 min exposures at f/2.0. I was able to easily minimize the halo to a level I felt comfortable with in a couple steps in Photoshop. I am extremely happy with this result.
Chris Hendren, www.hendrenimaging.net
Celestron RASA 8-optics and CGX-mount, ZWO ASI2600MM-P, Baader 6.5nm CMOS optimized High Speed Ha, SII, and OIII filters. 38x5 min SII, 35x5 min Ha, 37x5 min OIII at -10 C (550 min total exposure) HaSHO aquired in NINA and processed in Deep Sky Stacker, PixInsight, StarNet++, and Photoshop CC.
UPDATE: I tried the Baader 6.5nm High Speed HA filter with an f/4.5 TPO Ultrawide (Askar FMA180 clone) scope just to satisfy my curiosity on how slower scopes worked with the high-speed filter. I binned 2x2 to compensate for the reduced signal and then shot 46 x 2 min exposures unguided near Gamma Cygni. ~72% QE at H-alpha with the ZWO ASI2600MM-P certainly helped. I will likely have a lot more trouble with SII and OIII at the slower f/ratio, but this experiment worked pretty well.
No calibration frames. Processed in DSS, PixInsight, and Photoshop CC.
New images 30th August 2021:
I had two good nights this last weekend, so I decided to try an HOO narrowband combination on IC 1396 as I had no sulfur data. The green channel is actually 25% HA and 75% OIII, while HA is mapped to Red and OIII to blue. This was a nice way to get a “close to RGB color” narrowband image from my Bortle 9 skies with a bright moon up. Celestron CGX and RASA 8, ZWO ASI2600MM-P, the above mentioned Baader filters. 130 min HA and 160 min OIII (5 min subs) at -10C, acquired in NINA. Processed in DSS, PixInsight, and Photoshop CC.
One of our first testers is Andreas Bringmann, owner of a 2.6m Baader Classic Dome and renowned Astro-Photographer – see his images on www.astrobin.com/users/equinoxx/. The all new f/2 Ultra-Highspeed Filters not only lead to amazing images but even enabled the photographic proof of the newly discovered planetary nebula StDr13, check out the detailed test review.
I would like to emphasize, that the opportunity you have given me to test the new CMOS-optimized filters has been for me, an astro-amateur, like winning the lottery!
Andreas Bringmann, www.astrobin.com/equinoxx/
Now Mr. Bringmann had the opportunity to test the new CMOS optimized Baader 5.5nm H-Beta filters:
First of all, I would like to thank you very much for allowing me to test the new Baader filters and I can report that the new CMOS-optimized 5.5nm H-beta filter works photographically perfectly even at f/1.9!
Andreas Bringmann, www.astrobin.com/equinoxx/
The new CMOS-optimized 5.5nm H-beta filter was compared against the old 8.5nm H-beta filter from 2014, which was in Mr. Bringmann's possession.
Our QHY- and filter expert Christoph Kaltseis held a lecture on our new CMOS-optimized Baader (Ultra-)Narrowband and Highspeed Filters at the ATT DIGITAL show on Saturday, May 8th 2021. The lecture was held in german language only, we apologize. Also the presentation material exists only in German (at least so far). In case you're still interested, you can find the PDF to the right.
after almost 1.5 years of constant tests of always new prototype runs of Baader filters in four different filter categories, I do conclude that the outcome superseeds my expectations, especially considering the prices.
Christoph Kaltseis, www.cedic.at
After initial testing, I was pleased to find that the new CMOS-optimized Baader filters with reflex blocker coating work great. With the much narrower passages, there is hardly any light pollution, but plenty of signal and contrast. There are also no halos or reflections, even with very bright stars, which I have never seen before on f/2.
I used the freshly arrived highspeed filters for a quick snapshot of NGC7000 with my RASA 8. The image consists of 5x120s O III and 15x120s Ha, so a 40 minutes bicolor image. This definitely shows what can be done with a fast system and good filters. I don't like to expose less than 10h, but with such bright nebulae I would be done after 4-5h.
Julian Shroff, Instagram, Youtube
Also a quick first test with the highspeed H-alpha filter on Deneb with 30s, as well as 60s shots shows the difference clearly in my eyes. There is much less unwanted light coming through and also the slight halo, which is present with other filters I have used so far, has completely disappeared even with an extreme stretch.
Last night (03.May 2021) it was clear for a short time. I have now also made a few 30s and 60s exposures of Deneb with the O III filter. On the 30s images the image looks perfect, on the 60s there is a very faint halo - at maximum stretch. Considering that with other O III filters I used to have halos on virtually every even remotely bright star, I find this very satisfying.
Our british customer has been testing our new CMOS-optimized filters in combination with a QHY 268M camera (read more about that here).
I'm very impressed with the Baader UNBs and managed to get some H-alpha data under Bortle 7 skies with my new CMOS camera. Having used previous Baader high speed filters on my RASA 11, I can confirm that these are a step forward in conjunction with the RASA optical configuration, that is putting so many lenses very near in front of the filter. These new UNBs definitely are improving contrast with the RASA and helping me to keep stars under much tighter control. The UNB-OIII filter likewise has improved considerably with the Frontside Reflex-Blocker technology, with no halos recorded in this images data (unfortunately due to the weather the data is incomplete to make a pretty bi-colour picture).