Morpheus

Important Care Tips for astronomical instruments

Please, observe the following guidelines to protect your telescope/mount and avoid damage or even loss of warranty.

Recent Reviews by Category (View All)

12,5 mm Morpheus® 76° widefield eyepiece

Enjoyable but nagging...

First use of my 12.5mm Morpheus was pleasant and a treat in less than ideal skies. I bought this through "AAP" an online selling service. The packaging looked like it had been repackaged used because the cardboard is not shaped so tore at stress points. I complained to AAP due to this and the fact the rubber side eye shield was "missing" its ring. Lo and behold, only the main eye cup has a ring, despite the rubber being designed to fit over a ring. The 500 of these they sold routinely tear their packaging in the box I was told. If mounting as a 2", I need my focuser extension tube (Orion 12/f-5 and 1500) These details left me unimpressed. A Euro/Dollar's worth of metal ring seems a silly expense to chintz on. So, I like the wide angle EP so far, but found the chintzy details have ruined what should have been an enjoyable experience. I had hoped the Baader name would mean attention to detail, so experienced disappointment.

Syllevator

17,5 mm Morpheus® 76° widefield eyepiece

17.5mm Morpheus and Televue 17.3mm

Ordered your 17.5mm Morpheus and also the Televue 17.3mm. Delos. After doing a comparison in my 406mm / f5.2 scope, I sent the Televie Delos back for a refund. The Morpheus was so close it was hard to see any difference. I quickly ordered a 12.5mm Morpheus and have been also very happy with its performance. Baader has developed a quality optic at a very cost effective price point.

Jeff

12,5 mm Morpheus® 76° widefield eyepiece

Morpheus 12.5mm

This has become my first choice for an eyepiece for my 5" SCT (with a nominal magnification of 100x). The AFOV is generous, the optical quality excellent, and the viewing comfort high. No detectable "black bean" effect.

Yarkho

17,5 mm Morpheus® 76° widefield eyepiece

Morpheus 17,5mm

Gestern Nacht (5. 2. 2018) habe ich das Morpheus 17.5mm das erste Mal testen können und auch Bilder mit der Nikon DF (Vollformat) gemacht. Seeing medium. Das Okular ist spitze! Die neue Version der Augenmuschel SUPER!!! Das Feld ist wunderbar, sehr gute Schärfe und hoher Kontrast und so hatte ich einen Festplatz in der Mondfähre!!!

Christoph Kaltseis

12,5 mm Morpheus® 76° widefield eyepiece

12.5mm Morpheus vs. 12.5mm Docter

Saturday I loaned my 12.5mm Docter to a friend so he could compare it with his 12.5mm Morpheus. Sunday afternoon he brought the Docter back to me along with the 12.5mm Morpheus so I could compare the two for myself last night. I spent almost two hours exclusively going back and forth between these two eyepieces on deep sky objects in my SW120ED. These eyepieces give 72x in the 120ED. Overall, the 12.5mm Morpheus was extremely close to the Docter and in fact to see any differences in faintest stars detected or nebular details was a challenge. Edge performance: Docter is sharp to the edge and Morpheus has some falloff in last 10% of the field but not significant. Comfort: The Docter was a little easier to look through at first, but as time progressed this difference mostly disappeared. Handling: The Morpheus actually is a more balanced eyepiece than the Docter. There is a significant bulk of the weight in the bottom of the Docter. If you grab near the top of the eyepiece there is a risk of it slipping. The Docter really needs to be grabbed at the lower knurled ring. Presentation: Just as a general feel, the field of the 12.5mm Docter is very similar to the Morpheus eyepieces - different from the XW and Delos eyepieces. In both eyepieces the field is very natural and engaging and easy to take in Snap to focus: Not that the 12.5 Morpheus was hard to focus, but the Docter was easier to snap to sharpest focus. Sky background: Seemed the same level of blackness in both eyepieces - maybe a couple times a slight edge to the Docter, but maybe not. It was close. Sharpness of stars: In general I think the Docter gives a very slightly tighter star image - possibly due to the easier snap to focus. Observing targets: M27 - No difference in detectable details - maybe the light was a little richer in the Morpheus. M71 - At times seemed slightly grainier with barely resolved stars in the Docter. M17 - No detectable difference in details M11 - No detectable difference in details and resolved stars NGC 6712 - Maybe the light was a little richer in the Morpheus. M8 - Maybe the light was a little richer in the Morpheus. M27 again - Maybe the light was a little richer in the Morpheus. M13 - No clear difference in resolved stars. NGC 6819 - A times a slightly grainier texture from resolved stars in the Docter. Field stars in general - I spent quite a bit of time in the fields of the different objects above identifying barely detectable stars with averted vision. Generally these stars were slightly easier to detect in the Docter - but very slightly and it took work to be confident that was what I was seeing. In no case was a star detectable in one eyepiece undetectable in the other. Summary: Wow - these two eyepieces are close. I really love the 9mm and 6.5mm Morpheus for deep sky. So it was really nice to be able to see how closely the 12.5mm Morpheus is able to match the 12.5mm Docter. My observations seem to indicate that where faint stars are concerned the Docter may have a little easier pull whereas with nebular or unresolved light the Morpheus may actually give a little richer light. The presentation and comfort of these two eyepieces is very close. The Morpheus is basically like a slightly narrower Docter in that respect. Now - I do think for lunar observations the Docter is better than the Morpheus eyepieces. I have done comparisons with the 9mm and 6.5mm Morpheus and the Docter with a Barlow and I think in general it is easier to look through the Docter when observing the Moon and I think there is an extra level of crispness to the lunar image in those circumstances. Hopefully this week I can do a direct comparison between the 12.5mm Morpheus and the Docter on the Moon to see if that holds up. At any rate - for those of you that have been considering trying a Docter, the Morpheus makes a very acceptable lower cost substitute - at least for deep sky with my scope and the atmospheric conditions in my area.

russell23

12,5 mm Morpheus® 76° widefield eyepiece

12,5 mm Morpheus Okular

Bin mit der Leistung und Handhabung dieses Okulars vollauf zufrieden, auch im Vergleich mit anderen Okularen vergleichbaren Typs.

Gerd R.

Most Recent Product Questions

Rated: 1

3/31/2020 9:03 AM Baader 2" ClickLock Diagonal Mirror

Can a UFC be inserted between the 2" barrel nosepiece and the diagonal body (point A in this discussion: https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/blog/optical-tube-lengths-of-clicklock-mirror-diagonal) by using #2459128 and #2459120 for the telescope and camera adapters on the UFC respectively?

Is Answered? Yes (1 answer)

Answer rated: 1

The parts you mention should work fine to connect the UFC between the diagonal body and the 2" barrel. However, due to the threads, the end position of the UFC cannot be adjusted to your preferation, it might stop at an unfavourable position. We are thinking about developing an Camera-sided UFC adapter with S58 dovetail receptor. This would allow exact positioning to your needs. However it will take months before this product may come to the market.
Answer by: Baader Web Team (Admin) on Mar 31, 2020 9:55:00 AM
Rated: 0

3/31/2020 12:29 AM Baader MaxBright® II Binoviewer with case

I have a Celestron 1100 Edge HD, will this Binoviewer work with that? And if so, what accessories will I need?
I also have a 70mm SolarMax III. Will I be able to use it with that? Again what accessories will I need?

Is Answered? Yes (1 answer)

Answer rated: 0

Its hard to answer this question in general. Yes, the MaxBright II Binoviewer will work with an Celestron 11" EdgeHD. But there are many ways to adapt it. Most (if not all) customers will use a Binoviewer on a SC telescope in combination with a star diagonal. There are many different star diagonals available (or even our Baader FlipMirror II) and many possible ways to adapt it. We recommend that you look at our extensive 24-page manual, which illustrates many possible adaptation options and required adapters: https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/downloads/dl/file/id/1614/product/4317/manual_baader_maxbrightr_ii_binoviewer.pdf

Furthermore we recommend to take a look at our PDF: Manual and Recommended Use of Baader Star Diagonals (T-2 and 2"):
https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/downloads/dl/file/id/1617/product/1687/baader_star_diagonals_t_2_and_2.pdf

Unfortunately we don't sell the SolarMax III and don't know its thread sizes and most of all the available backfocus (but we strongly assume that it is very much too small). So we cant comment here on required accessories or functionality.
Answer by: Baader Web Team (Admin) on Apr 2, 2020 2:29:00 PM
Rated: 0

3/31/2020 12:00 AM Baader H-alpha 7nm CCD Narrowband-Filter

You state that this filter can be used down to f/2.8. Since I already have one of these filters I wonder if it will be possible to use it with a RASA 8" f/2 that I just bought? What problem may occur and do I really need the ultrafast filter?

Is Answered? Yes (1 answer)

Answer rated: 0

There will be significantly less signal arriving at the chip area. The exposure times will then be up to 10 times longer - but still so short that it can only be quantified by comparing the signal strength/exposure times with and without filters. A set of real high speed filters will be inevitable. And it is not just a matter of shifting wavelengths. The filter has to be constructed differently from the coating layer arrangement to avoid strong vignetting.
Answer by: Baader Web Team (Admin) on Apr 2, 2020 10:04:00 AM
Rated: -1

3/29/2020 12:52 PM Laser Colli - Mark III

I'm looking for an instruction manual for my baader laser colli mk2.
Particually the battery's?
Thanks

Is Answered? Yes (1 answer)

Answer rated: 0

You can find the instruction manual from the website under <downloads> or direct by this link:
https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/downloads/dl/file/id/157/product/1123/adjustment_collimation_of_newtonian_telescopes_with_the_help_of_the_laser_colli_mark_iii.pdf
On the last page you can see that the Laser Colli needs SR41 batteries, positive side faces out.
Answer by: Baader Web Team (Admin) on Apr 1, 2020 9:18:00 AM
Rated: -1

3/25/2020 11:15 PM Baader ClickLock Eyepiece Clamp 1¼" with built in diopter-adjustment (T-2 part #08)

What is optical lightpath length in mm? thank you

Is Answered? Yes (1 answer)

Answer rated: -1

The optical lightway can be found under the Tab "Specifications". It is adjustable from 32 - 38 mm.
Answer by: Baader Web Team (Admin) on Mar 26, 2020 9:16:00 AM

Baader Planetarium GmbH

Our company exists now for more than 50 years. In this time, more than 15.000 Baader Planetariums (the first patented product of our company) help all over the world to give students an understanding of astronomical correlations. In our own manufactory, more than 500 observatory domes have been produced and delivered turnkey-ready. Instruments and telescope accessories from "Baader" are known for their high qualities by many astronomers and universities. We consider it our duty and obligation, not only to sell telescopes, but an indivdually selected telescope system, that brings you a lifetime of joy.

Company