Optisches Zubehör

Begeisterung pur! All meine Okulare bleiben Qualitativ auf hohem Niveaux.

Ich habe erst später bemerkt, dass das Okular auch modular einsetzbar ist: z. B. mit zugehörigem 1,25"-Adapter und einer sehr guter Barlow 2x erhält man die Brennweite von 15,5 mm. Hier wird das Okular richtig gut: nachdem ich mit dieser Kombi z. B. gamma Vir im LZOS 130/780 trennen konnte (was mir mit einem TeleVue Plössl 15 mm nicht gelang), habe ich das TeleVue verkauft. Also, sehr viele gute Möglichkeiten mit dem Hyp 31...

WA-Okular mit hervorragender Transmission. Am 5" f/6 Triplet Apo nicht mehr randscharf, im Zentralbereich jedoch sehr gut. Gute Haptik und sehr leicht für ein 2" WA. Preis-/Leisungs-Verhältnis stimmen.

Hochwertigste Verarbeitung, präzises Wirkung und reichhaltiges Adaptionszubehör anbei - was will man mehr - bei Konkurrenzprodukten habe ich das eine oder andere schmerzlich vermisst... Klare Kaufempfehlung wenn man photographisch einen Umlenkspiegel benötigt!

Dies ist das beste Okular durch das ich jemals schauen durfte, Punkt, nein, Ausrufezeichen! Super klar, super scharf, toller Blinkwinkel, einfach eine Freude!

Nutze diesen Adapter für meine Pentax XW Okulare. Sehr gute Verarbeitung. Beide Gewinde passen leichtgängig und halten eine EOS 77D stabil.

I use this with a few scopes from 80mm to 152mm APO refractors, 14 . 11" and 8" SCTs. I also have Astro Physics and a Hutech 2" diagonals. The BAADER does give a bit more on planets and DS probably due to wider range of frequencies it passes. Oters have noted this also. BUT....here is the scary part... I am also a solar observer. with Coronado Ha and Lunt Ha scopes, Day Star, Ha, and BAADER Cool Cermaic Hershel Wedge. I had planned on using my new BBHS BAADER diagonal with my favorite Ha setup but luckiily it wouldn't quite reach focus with some of my eyepieces due to a bit more back focus with the click lock (excellent device though normally). As a result I used my other two diagonals. About a year after buying the BBHS I happened to come across a warning email by BAADER that warned to NOT use the BBHS diagonals for Ha due to the additional radiation it apsses as a result of coatings. These could be dangerous to the user as well as equipment. While I love my BAADER equipment I think that warning should have been included in all product descriptions and user manuals. Here is the email I saw from BAADER: ========================= Question.. Can I use a UV / IR blocking filter and / or the BBHS mirror before an H-alpha or calcium approach? Do you recommend the 2 "BBHS or the 2" ClickLock star diagonal? -74Question by: Enrique V. on 10/14/2016 9:41:00 AM | 1 answer (s) For observing the sun in H-alpha in combination with a suitable filter combination, we recommend the normal, dielectric Clicklock mirror, because below 380nm and above 740nm it conveys significantly less radiation into the eyepiece than the BBHS star diagonal. The star diagonal thus significantly reduces the load on downstream filters. Please always use a suitable energy protection filter in front of the lens in order to keep the strain on the filter as low as possible. We strongly advise against visual observation of the sun through a calcium filter - the 397nm of the calcium line are in the UV; It is known that UV radiation can trigger photoxic reactions in the eye and lead to eye damage. In addition, even young people have only a low sensitivity to these wavelengths, which decreases even further with age. Therefore, the eye does not notice that the intensity is far too high. If you want to increase the intensity (for example with a different zenith mirror) in order to see a brighter picture, the risk of eye damage increases. According to the latest standards for eye safety and ophthalmological findings, the sun must not be visually observed at 397 nm. We urgently recommend observing the sun in calcium only photographically, then no zenith mirror is necessary. We cannot understand why some manufacturers offer calcium filters for visual solar observation. We also advise against placing a filter close to the focal point - an energy protection filter should be placed in front of the lens, even if high demands are placed on the optical quality of a large filter. A filter close to the focus saves money because it can be made much smaller, but we absolutely cannot recommend it - both because of our own conscience and because of EU regulations. The filter absorbs all of the energy that the lens collects - and could break at any time. For technical as well as ethical reasons, we can only recommend a dielectric energy protection filter in front of the lens. Answer by: Baader Web Team (Admin) on 10/14/2016 9:43:00 AM

If you have more than 5 eyepieces a case is recommended. You have the eyepieces protected and all in one place. This case is excellent and is not only suited for Morpheus or Hyperion eyepieces. I put eyepieces of other brands in the case as well. The case is light as it is made of aluminium. I recommend this case if you want to take care of your eyepieces.

Top quality low power 21mm in a 1.25" fitting This eyepiece represents outstanding quality at a reasonable price. A lovely Baader feature is that the Hyperions will fit both 1.25" and 2" focusers/diagonals. Nice fit and finish with an easy to identify colour band (not that that helps much in the dark). I use this unit mainly for Hydrogen-Alpha solar observations where it performs better than some wider field eyepieces with more elements. ( I used the 21, 13 & 8mm Hyperions) I also think the Baader multi-coatings make a difference. Overall highly recommended for those seeking to balance quality vs price.

A very comfortable to use eyepiece in the 13 mm focal length. 68 degree is quite wide for most users. This eyepiece represents outstanding quality at a reasonable price. A lovely Baader feature is that the Hyperions will fit both 1.25" and 2" focusers/diagonals. Nice fit and finish with an easy to identify colour band (not that that helps much in the dark). I use this unit mainly for Hydrogen-Alpha solar observations where it performs better than some wider field eyepieces with more elements. ( I used the 21, 13 & 8mm Hyperions) I also think the Baader multi-coatings make a difference. Overall highly recommended for those seeking to balance quality vs price.

A very comfortable to use eyepiece in the 8mm focal length. 68 degree is quite wide for most users. This eyepiece represents outstanding quality at a reasonable price. A lovely Baader feature is that the Hyperions will fit both 1.25" and 2" focusers/diagonals. Nice fit and finish with an easy to identify colour band (not that that helps much in the dark). I use this unit mainly for Hydrogen-Alpha solar observations where it performs better than some wider field eyepieces with more elements. I also think the Baader multi-coatings make a difference. Overall highly recommended for those seeking to balance quality vs price.

I purchased this case to store my set of Hyperion eyepieces. The case is nice and sturdy, yet very light. It houses my eyepiece set perfectly and I love that the case is not too thick, but would still provide enough protection from unintentional drops, etc. Its not as strong as a safe case but the case is perfect for my use due to its size and weight. The foam inside is cut perfectly for my Hyperion’s and it’s a very firm foam.

I live in an apartment in a light-polluted area. Astronomy for me means balancing the portability of my telescope setup against the quality of image provided, while minding my budget. The Hyperion Zoom had great reviews and wider Fields of View than cheaper models drew my attention. The 1.25" or 2" nosepieces allow for homogenizing barrel diameter with other eyepieces of either size, should my requirements require the purchasing of higher or lower power EPs outside of the Zoom''s range. I took the plunge and am pleased with the results. The Hyperion Zoom has proved to be the indispensable mainstay I'd hoped it would be!

die Barlowlinse ist die perfekte Ergänzung zu Mark IV Zoom

Ich habe seit 2008 einen 12"/ f6Newton und mit einer SBIG ST-10 XME mit samt 10x-Filterrad und adaptiver Optik AO-8 im Betrieb. Das Problem war daß ich Abzüglich der Filter und der Planglasoptik vom AO immer noch gut 84mm Abstand zum Sensor hatte. Zuerst behalf ich mir mit einer Barlowlinse, aber auch bei einem Langbrennweitigen Newton hat man photographisch ein nur sehr geringes brauchbares Bildfeld und man verliert durch die Brennweitenverlängerung weiter an Lichtstärke. Fast alle Standartkorrektoren für Newtons haben so um die 55mm Arbeitsabstand (vielleicht auch mal max. 69mm). Mit dem RCC_I (Dreilinsiger !)Rowe-Korrektor hat man die perfekte Lösung ! An meinem 12"/f6 Newton bekomme ich in Verbindung mit dem RCC eine spitzenmäßige Sternabbildung (siehe ST-10 Aufnahme mit nur 2min Belichtungszeit, bei 1.8 Meter Brennweite und 1x bin). Und sogar auf Vollformat sind die Sterne noch erstaunlich gut abgebildet, allerdings hat man da schon deutliche Vignetierung. Siehe 3x30s=90s M81+82 Aufnahme mit einer Canon 6D (bei 25.600 ASA) Ich täte den Korrektor aber bis APS-C Format (eventuell noch Flatfield abziehen) absolut empfehlen. Zumindest bei Langbrennweitigen Newton arbeitet der Korrektor überraschend gut, mit f4 habe ich noch keine Erfahrung damit. Zusammenfassend muß man folgendes beachten: -Man braucht unbedingt ausreichend Backfocus von mind. 92mm und kann aber mit einem Kniff durch das Entfernen des Stoppringes, was den Arbeitsabstand zwar von 91.5mm auf 94.5mm erhöht, in den Okularauszug ein Stück weit versenken und Backfocus gewinnen. -Die Ausleuchtung und Korrektur reicht noch bis APS-C (bis ca. 28mm-auch wenn mancher Händler nur 20mm angibt, habe ausgemessen) Für Vollformat ist der Korrektor NICHT geeignet. -Mit f6 oder gar lichtstärker sehr gute nadelförmige Sterne von der opt. Achse bis zum Rand, keine Aufblähungen wie bei 2-Linser (Ross) - Der Preis ist erstaunlich günstig, vergleichbare Korrektoren sind da schonmal 2-3x teurer - Der große Arbeitsabstand ist ein herausragendes Alleinstellungsmerkmal !