What step down adapter is suggested from a 52 mm to "-- mm"?
For adapting any cell mounted Baader 2 inch Filter onto a camera lens with 52mm front filter thread you will need:
#2408166 Baader DSLR 2" Filter-Holder M48/SP54: http://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/baader-dslr-2%22-filter-holder-m48sp54.html
#2958052 Baader Lens-Adapter-Ring SP 54/ M52: http://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/baader-hyperion-dt-ring-sp54m52-for-dtadapter-iiandiii-and-hyperion-eyepieces.html
Both thread sizes come with our proprietary pitch - which is not the same for the female and male threads.
This is our own proprietary "emergency solution" for uniting a world were manufacturers all over the world copy from each other - to the point that there are almost a dozen different pitches in use for male and female threads. Traditionally US-companies used to do a UNF-based pitch and the rest of the world went for metric threads - but these do vary from 0.5 to 0.75.
For this reason it does not make sense to publish our non standard pitch because our pitch is made to cope with all existing metric and US-pitch standards - and as said - our solution has evolved from sheer necessity. It is a mixture of a queer pitch and under-/over-dimensioning . We will not want to declare this as a standard and get bashed up for it. It works for us and is a result of 20 years adaptation to fit our filters onto all crazy threads we have seen. And inspite of this - every now and then there comes another "dragonboat-eyepiece" were even our filters may not fit...
The housing of the 1,25-inch filter has got an outer diameter of 31mm and is 6mm high (8mm high, if you include the thread). It is this filter cell: http://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/filter-cell-1%C2%BCandquot-low-profile-6mm-height.html
Baader H-Beta-Filter – the H-Alpha-Filter for visual observations!
The Baader H-Beta-Filter with 8.5nm half width is especially useful at telescopes with 8" or larger apertures or if you are working with large exit pupils. This narrowband-filter delivers a much higher contrast, compared to common visual H-beta-filters. H-Beta-nebule-filters with a wider half-width deliver a brighter image and will also show you e.g. the California nebula,but it won't be so clear, and you will miss many of its inner structures. Without any filter, this nebula (to name just one of many) will be completely invisible under brighter skies.
About Baader H-alpha Filters and why they aren't suited for visual observations
The development of narrow-band H-Alpha-filters soon proved to be a "Game-Changer" for Amateur-Astrophotographers. No other spectral line of emission nebulae will give you so much information for the creation of "pretty pictures" as this Hydrogen-line. This is supported by the better coatings, sensitive CCD-cameras, motorized focusers and last but not least the the incredible tracking precision of modern mounts, which allow for very long exposure times with very narrow-band filters. Modern images are often based on exposure times of 30 hours through the three common, very narrow-band nebula filters. But to make use of this, the mount must provide "subpixel"-tracking, the focuser must not flex even for a micron, and its motor must compensated for temperature changes by keeping the focus up to a fraction of a millimeter... All this is possible – but you need high-end equipment.
This is not necessary for visual observations. But unfortunately, we do not profit from those photographically wonderful filters when we are looking through the eyepiece – at low intensities at night, the human eye is almost blind for this part of the spectrum. During daylight, when there is plenty of light, we can easily see H-Alpha. But at night and low-light, we can't perceive these wavelengths. In contrast to a camera, our eyes also can't add upp the light.
Because of this, most visual observers use the well-known O III-filter. The human eye has got its highest sensitivity between 500nm and 520nm, where we can observe many structures in supernova-remnants, planetary nebulae and so on. But they are pretty useless for deep sky objects which shine mainly in H-alpha.
The alternative – Baader H-Beta filter for visual applicationsFor the H-alpha-objects mentioned above, the H-beta-line is a good option: At 486nm, it still quite close to the region of highest sensitivity of our eye. Because of quantum-mechanical coupling with H-Alpha, we can usually see the same structures. H-Beta-filters are much more efficient than O-III, because most nebulae emit hydrogen-light – although H-Beta is not as popular as H-Beta.
A H-beta filter can be regarded as a visual H-Alpha-filter.
The H-Beta-spectrum is indeed very interesting. Quantum-mechanics define a fixed ratio between H-Alpha and H-Beta, but because of the shorter wavelengths, H-Beta has got a higher energy. That's why H-Beta suffers from a higher extinction rate in interstellar dust regions, which can easily be detected. The ratio between H-Beta and H-Alpha gives you information about the amount of dust between us and the source, which is especially interesting for scientific work. For astrophotography, you can scale down the intensity of H-Alpha to simulate an H-Beta-filter – and if you are observing with your eyepiece, you will see structures which were almost invisible before.
Visual observers profit from the fact that a H-Beta-filter can show the dust regions in hydrogen-emitting nebulae quite clearly, similar to a photographical H-Alpha-filter. Larger telescope apertures can even show the split-up into two lines – and the soft phase-out towards the edge.
The filter is almost as impressive when you are looking at the dust tails of comets. Especially light with shorter wavelengths will be scattered more in the dust tail, so that the contrast to its surroundings increases. Light with even shorter wave-lengths will be scattered even more, but our eye is not so sensitive for these parts of the spectrum. The true dimensions of the sometimes very long dust tail may only be recognizable in the eyepiece with the help of a H-Beta-filter. The H-Beta line is also outside of the prominent lines of the gas tail, so the dust tail can be better deiscerned from the gas tail – and the contrast is increased even more.
A dielectric H-Beta-filter is no allround-filter like e.g. a Neodymium-Skyglow-filter. But it is the best available tool to see faint details, because you can visually see the dominating hydrogen emission lines in the sky – something which an O-III-filter can't show you. Together with an O-III-filter, it covers the most important spectral lines of emission nebulae and is an important tool for visual deep-sky-observers.
|Technical Data not yet specified||Please choose product variant from dropdown above to see technical data of your chosen product|